When learning C++—or revisiting its more nuanced features—you’ve likely come across the explicit keyword on constructors or conversion operators. At first glance, it might look like just another keyword that doesn’t do much. However, explicit keyword play a critical role in preventing unintentional conversions that can lead to bugs or confusing code. In this blog post, we will delve into what the explicit keyword means, why it exists, and how to use it effectively.

What is explicit?

In C++, the explicit keyword is used primarily to mark constructors or user-defined type conversion operators in a way that prohibits the compiler from performing implicit conversions through them. By default, a constructor that can be called with a single parameter can act as a conversion constructor. This means the compiler might automatically convert one type to another in situations that you did not explicitly intend.

For example, consider this simple class:

class Vector2D {
public:
    // Constructor that takes a single float
    Vector2D(float magnitude)
        : x(magnitude), y(magnitude) {}

private:
    float x;
    float y;
};

With this setup, any time the compiler sees an expression that expects a Vector2D but is provided a float it will create a Vector2D object implicitly. While this can be convenient, it can also lead to unexpected conversions and subtle bugs.

Overview of the Explicit Keyword in C++

The explicit keyword in C++ is used primarily to prevent unintentional implicit conversions that can occur with single-argument constructors. When you mark a constructor as explicit, you are telling the compiler—and anyone reading your code—that this constructor should only be used when you explicitly call it. This helps avoid subtle bugs caused by implicit type conversions.

Key Points

• Context: The explicit keyword applies to constructors (and in C++11 and later, to conversion operators).
• Purpose: Prevents automatic type conversion that might otherwise happen with a single-argument constructor.
• Benefit: Makes your code safer, clearer, and easier to debug by avoiding unintended conversions.

Why Use explicit?

1. Prevent Unintended Conversions

Imagine you accidentally write a function that expects a Vector2D, but you pass a float by mistake. Without explicit, the compiler will happily construct a Vector2D from that float, which may not be what you intended.

By marking the constructor as explicit, you ensure that any conversion from a float to a Vector2D must be done intentionally by the developer:

class Vector2D {
public:
    explicit Vector2D(float magnitude)
        : x(magnitude), y(magnitude) {}
    // ...
};

Now, if you try to write code like:

void doSomethingWithVector(Vector2D vec);

int main() {
    doSomethingWithVector(5.0f); // Error: implicit conversion not allowed
    return 0;
}

You’ll get a compiler error indicating that an implicit conversion is not possible. Instead, you must explicitly construct the object:

doSomethingWithVector(Vector2D(5.0f)); // OK

2. Clearer, More Maintainable Code

Explicitly forcing conversions makes your code clearer and more maintainable. When reading code, it’s easy to see that an object is being constructed intentionally rather than having the compiler silently do it for you. This reduces “magic” behavior in your codebase.

3. Helps Avoid Logical Errors

Bugs caused by unintended conversions can be hard to spot, especially when dealing with complex classes or template code. By using explicit, you help ensure that any creation or transformation of your objects is done with full awareness.

Syntax of the Explicit Keyword in C++

The explicit keyword precedes the constructor declaration in your class. Here’s the general form:

class ClassName {
public:
    explicit ClassName(Type arg) {
        // constructor implementation
    }

    // Other class members...
};

• Placement: Put explicit before the constructor keyword and class name.
• Usage: Typically placed on single-argument constructors or conversion operators to prevent accidental or implicit conversions.

When Should You Use explicit?

A good rule of thumb is that if you have a single-argument constructor (or conversion operator) that should not be called implicitly, mark it as explicit. If you find yourself wanting convenience conversions to your type in multiple places, consider carefully whether those conversions are indeed safe and desirable.

In general:

• Classes that represent numeric or string-like types might allow implicit conversions if it match users’ expectations (e.g., std::string can be constructed from a const char* implicitly).
• “Smart” or “Owner” classes (like smart pointers) usually require explicit constructors to avoid silent conversions that could lead to resource management bugs.
• Conversion operators often should be explicit unless you are sure implicit usage leads to clear, intended semantics.

Examples of the Explicit Keyword in C++

Example without explicit

#include <iostream>
#include <string>

class StringWrapper {
public:
    // Single-argument constructor (not marked explicit)
    StringWrapper(const std::string& str) : data(str) {}

    void print() const {
        std::cout << data << std::endl;
    }

private:
    std::string data;
};

int main() {
    StringWrapper sw1 = "Hello, World!";  // Implicit conversion from const char* to StringWrapper
    sw1.print(); // Output: Hello, World!
    
    return 0;
}

In this example, the constructor for StringWrapper is not declared with explicit. As a result, sw1 can be initialized directly from a const char* (the string literal "Hello, World!"). The compiler automatically converts "Hello, World!" into a StringWrapper.

Example with explicit

#include <iostream>
#include <string>

class StringWrapper {
public:
    // Single-argument constructor marked explicit
    explicit StringWrapper(const std::string& str) : data(str) {}

    void print() const {
        std::cout << data << std::endl;
    }

private:
    std::string data;
};

int main() {
    // StringWrapper sw1 = "Hello, World!";  // ERROR: implicit conversion is not allowed
    StringWrapper sw2("Hello, World!");      // OK: explicit call
    sw2.print(); // Output: Hello, World!

    return 0;
}

Here, by marking the constructor as explicit you cannot write StringWrapper sw1 = "Hello, World!" because the compiler will not allow an implicit conversion. You are forced to call the constructor explicitly with parentheses: StringWrapper sw2("Hello, World!");.

This small change ensures that all type conversions are deliberate and explicit, making your code more predictable and less error-prone.

Is There an Explicit Keyword in C?

You might see people searching for “explicit keyword C” or “c explicit keyword,” but C does not have a explicit keyword. The concept of constructors and implicit conversions belongs primarily to C++. In standard C, there are no constructors, so you do not need a explicit keyword.

Implicit vs. Explicit Conversions

To understand why explicit is necessary, let’s start with the concept of implicit conversions. If you have a constructor that takes a single parameter, C++ can use it to implicitly convert from the parameter’s type to your class type. For example:

class MyString {
public:
    // A constructor that can be called with a C-style string
    MyString(const char* s) {
        // ... copy s into internal buffer ...
    }
};

void printMyString(const MyString& ms) {
    // ... prints or processes ms ...
}

int main() {
    printMyString("Hello"); // Implicitly converts "Hello" to MyString
    return 0;
}

In this snippet, the compiler automatically calls MyString(const char*) when we call printMyString("Hello"). This conversion is convenient, but can sometimes lead to unexpected behavior if used incorrectly.

Key Takeaways

• Implicit conversions can sometimes cause bugs or make code unpredictable.
• Use explicit to disable these automatic conversions.
• C++11 and beyond allow marking conversion operators as explicit well.
• Apply explicit when your constructor or conversion operator should not be used implicitly.

Understanding this keyword and applying it appropriately will help you write more maintainable and reliable C++ code. With that said, there may be cases where implicit conversions are useful and expected but always think carefully before leaving your constructors and conversion operators non-explicit!

Conclusion

• In everyday language, explicit means something is clearly stated without any ambiguity.
• In C++, the explicit keyword is used for constructors (and conversion operators) to prevent implicit conversions.
• Using explicit enforces clarity and reduces potential bugs by ensuring developers explicitly call constructors when creating objects.
• There is no equivalent of the explicit keyword in C because C does not have constructors.

By understanding and using the C++ explicit keyword, you can write safer, more maintainable code. When someone asks, “What does explicit mean?” in the context of C++, you’ll know exactly how to answer—and how to apply it in your own projects.

Visit now: Hire developers